Secular Pastoral Qualities
The Rev. Ronald F. Marshall
December 2019
MARTIN
LUTHER ARGUED THAT ABOVE ALL PASTORS
must be faithful to the Lord Jesus – for “faithfulness is sought
and demanded” of them (Luther’s
Works 75:121). That alone, however, will not keep them in
the public ministry. Every year many ministers drop out of the
ministry at a high rate because they’re not suited for it (Faithful
and Fractured: Responding to the Clergy Health Crisis, 2018;
Brooks R. Faulkner,
Burnout in Ministry, 1981). What could change that? What
simple, secular, human traits would help pastors stay in the
ministry?
Ideas. If
you aren’t intellectual – having no interest in ideas or
abstractions – then you aren’t suited to be a pastor. The Bible,
after all, has over a thousand pages of ideas in it! So laboring
over such things as the different nuances between justification
and sanctification should be fascinating and invigorating. If
not, stay out of the ministry. Preachers, after all, “work in
words because God condescends to human speech” (Will Willimon,
Accidental Preacher,
2019, p. 154). There’s no escaping this, since “the Word, the
Word, the Word,… everything [in Christianity] depends on the
Word” (LW 40:212,
214). A “love of words,” then, wouldn’t be inordinate for
pastors (K. M. E. Murray,
Caught in a Web of Words, 1977, p. 333). Before God’s Words
preachers should stand “as wan and wild, as if they had seen a
spirit” (A. Habegger, My
Wars are Laid Away in Books, 2002, p. 312).
Bold.
Pastors are expected to stand up in front of people and talk in
public with confidence. If you’re too shy to do that, and it
makes you sick even to try, go into something else. Jonah,
remember, had the nerve to address the great city of Nineveh –
and tell them God was going to kill them (Jonah 3:4) – an
“extraordinary” feat (LW
19:49). And Saint Peter preached to thousands of Jews telling
them that they were condemned for killing Jesus (Acts 2:14–36).
Boldness has long marked the ministry (Acts 4:13, 29, 31, 9:27,
29, 13:46, 14:3, 18:26, 19:8, 2 Corinthians 3:12, Philippians
1:14, Ephesians 3:12, 6:19).
Multiplicity.
Pastors do many things at once and are always being interrupted.
If that drives you crazy – being pulled in opposite directions –
then don’t be a pastor. But if you find that whirl of
contradictory demands enriching and inspiring, then being a
pastor could be the ticket – the taking up of “all things” (1
Corinthians 9:22). It’s humbling to know that the ministry
doesn’t care about you focusing on one thing (Luke 10:42). The
fact that “God is not a God of confusion” (1 Corinthians 14:33),
doesn’t mean your life won’t be.
Sensitivities.
If your feelings are easily hurt, stay out of the ministry (I.
Sand & E. Svanholmer,
Highly Sensitive People in an Insensitive World, 2016).
Pastors need to have thick skin. That doesn’t mean, however,
that they ignore all the troubles around them. It’s just that
they don’t take any of it personally – even when they are being
attacked individually. They instead work to stay on topic. This
means they have strong emotional intelligence – and so they
don’t storm out of rooms and slam doors (D. Goleman,
Emotional Intelligence,
2005).
Curiosity.
If you don’t find people fascinating, the ministry will bore
you. Learning about the people you work with should be exciting
to you. That doesn’t mean that you’ll have to like everyone. No,
the nasty you simply will “avoid” (Romans 16:17). Still, pastors
should be people-persons. Loners have no place in the ministry –
all it will do is suffocate them. Pastor are interested in
people because their stories show “how this man or that woman
whose public life interests us has negotiated the problem of
self-awareness and has broken the internalized code a culture
supplies about how life should be experienced” (J. K. Conway,
When Memory Speaks,
1998, p. 17).
Conflict.
The ministry is full of conflict, chaos and confusion (Kenneth
C. Haugk, Antagonists in
the Church, 1988). If this buzzing mess doesn’t intrigue you
– find other work. Pastors have to want to enter into the fray –
and stay there for the long haul like “bulls” (LW
10:320). One pastor reports: “My days… were typified by
squabbling, disappointment followed by undeniable failure,
fornication between an alleged soprano and a bogus baritone,
[and a couple] duking it out in the parking lot before a
wedding” (Accidental
Preacher, p. 81). And another concludes: “[Regarding the
pastor, he is] either coming out of a storm, in a storm, or
heading for a storm” (H. Beecher Hicks, Jr.,
Preaching Through a Storm,
1987, p. 18). Ministry is a bumpy ride.
Writing.
Writing down your ideas is important for pastors. So if you
suffer from writers’ block, and it takes you forever to write
out anything, you’ll quickly burn out in the ministry. Saint
Paul is our example. He couldn’t have done his ministry without
writing down his intricate letters – unlike Jesus who wrote
nothing at all, except twice with his finger in the dirt (John
8:6–8). Nevertheless, Saint Paul’s letters “are the mountain the
teaching of the carpenter of Nazareth congealed into,” which no
one has been able to “scale” (Poems
of R. S. Thomas, 1985, p. 162). They, indeed, are very
challenging (2 Peter 3:16). So deft and challenging writing is
also part of the ministry. Saint Paul therefore shows us that
there’s a place for such complex letters and the like – to serve
as analyses of, and elaborations on, the simplicity of faith and
action. The same is expected of all pastors.
The Last American Church
The Rev. Ronald F. Marshall
First Lutheran Church of West Seattle
December 2019
Those who like our church tell me that it is
the only one like it left in America. When I hear that I think
of Larry McMurty’s famous novel,
The Last Picture Show
(1966) – which Peter Bogdanovich made into an award winning
movie in 1971 by the same title. But what makes our church the
last of its kind? I think it is because of these eight things
that
we’re simultaneously working on constantly –
unlike all other churches.
The Acerbic Word
God’s word is tough – and we don’t soften it.
Martin Luther said it’s “Christian severity” – and is “harsh” to
our hearing (asperam
veritatem) (Luther’s
Works 26:118, 11:58). We’re constantly striving for the Word
that smashes us with a hammer, burns us up with fire, and cuts
us into pieces with a two-edged sword (Jeremiah 23:29, Hebrews
4:12). We don’t try to run away from the Law that sends “the
lightning of divine wrath,” nor from the Gospel that
“suppresses” all the other salvations “of the flesh” (LW
26:310, 14:335). We need this dying (Galatians 2:20).
The Historic Liturgy
The ancient ordo of worship is best. So we
don’t experiment. Neither do we entertain when we worship
Almighty God (The Book of
Concord, ed. T. Tappert, p, 378). We keep the old forms of
ascending and descending (LW
36:56). We stand for the “true Christian mass according to the…
institution of Christ” (LW
38:208). The Lutheran
Book of Worship (1978) does this best. On how the
ELW (2006) fails, see
R. F. Marshall, “Evangelical
Lutheran Worship and Universalism,”
CrossAccent 2007.
Moral Convictions
Moral experiments don’t help. Ancient codes
hold wisdom (see
Connecting Virtues, ed. M. Croce & M. Vaccarezza, Wiley,
2018). Ethics designed to preserve favorable views of ourselves
are wrong (as in K. Appiah,
The Ethics of Identity,
Princeton, 2005). Virtue exceeds identity.
Children as Apprentices
Children’s sermons and youth Sundays are wrong. The young are in
training to become adult Christians. We don’t want a Christian
version of William Golding’s novel,
Lord of the Flies
(1954). We follow Søren
Kierkegaard (1813–55): “Christianity as it is found in the New
Testament,… is impossible for children [for it holds to] a good
which is identified by its hurting, a deliverance which is
identified by its making me unhappy, a grace which is identified
by suffering” (Journals,
ed. Hongs, §4:5007).
So we follow the critique of childish Christianity (1
Corinthians 13:11) in Thomas E. Bergler,
The Juvinalization of
American Christianity (Eerdmans, 2012). All of this is a
massive undertaking because it includes Luther’s austere view
that we need to train our children to “neither fear death nor
love this life” (LW
44:85).
Complex Music
Church music is to challenge aesthetically
and spiritually. So Luther admonishes: “Takes special care to
shun perverted minds who prostitute this lovely gift of nature
and of art with their erotic ranting; and be quite assured that
none but the devil goads them on to defy their very nature which
would and should praise God its Maker with this gift [of music],
so that these bastards purloin the gift of God and use it to
worship the foe of God” (LW
53:324). So the gold standard is Luther’s “A Mighty Fortress is
Our God” (1528) – but new hymns like, “We Had to Have Him Put
Away” (2014), also have a place in the church (listen to it at
flcws.org). New music isn’t as important as what kind of new
music it is.
Helping the Poor
Rather than seeking the favor of the wealthy
and powerful, we strive to “associate with the lowly” (Romans
12:16). In most cases the lowly are the homeless and the hungry
– but the sexually abused and politically oppressed cannot be
left out (Luke 10:37).
Beauty
In our architecture, gardens, vestments and
paraments, we avoid mismatching materials, colors and shapes;
poor construction; and using shoddy materials (Monroe C.
Beardsley, Aesthetics,
1958, pp. 527–530). And we also favor the historic symbols of
the church. We must never forget that God loves beauty (Psalm
27:4, Romans 10:15).
Small Quantitatively
Martin Luther is right that “size does not make the church” –
and so “what matters… is not becoming great, but becoming small”
(LW 2:101, 67:325).
The church, then, should not conform to worldly majorities
(Romans 12:2) – it’s a “little [μικρος]
flock” (Luke 12:32): “The church in the next several decades is
going to be a smaller, leaner, tougher company. I am convinced
that the way for the church now is to accept the shrinkage, to
penetrate the meaning and the threat of the prevailing
secularity, and to tighten its mind around the task given to the
critical cadre” (Joseph A. Sittler,
Grace Notes and Other
Fragments, 1981, p. 99).
|